| 000 -LEADER |
|---|
| fixed length control field |
02233nam a22002897a 4500 |
| 003 - CONTROL NUMBER IDENTIFIER |
|---|
| control field |
OSt |
| 005 - DATE AND TIME OF LATEST TRANSACTION |
|---|
| control field |
20190716140642.0 |
| 008 - FIXED-LENGTH DATA ELEMENTS--GENERAL INFORMATION |
|---|
| fixed length control field |
160622b xxu||||| |||| 00| 0 eng d |
| 040 ## - CATALOGING SOURCE |
|---|
| Transcribing agency |
University of Cebu-Banilad |
| Original cataloging agency |
University of Cebu-Banilad |
| 100 ## - MAIN ENTRY--PERSONAL NAME |
|---|
| Personal name |
Basig, Bernadette M. |
| 245 ## - TITLE STATEMENT |
|---|
| Title |
The confusing jurisprudence on confusing similarity and its impact in the enforcement of trademark rights / |
| Statement of responsibility, etc |
Bernadette M. Basig. |
| 260 ## - PUBLICATION, DISTRIBUTION, ETC. (IMPRINT) |
|---|
| Place of publication, distribution, etc |
Cebu City : |
| Date of publication, distribution, etc |
2016. |
| Name of publisher, distributor, etc |
University of Cebu, |
| 300 ## - PHYSICAL DESCRIPTION |
|---|
| Extent |
v, 55 leaves ; |
| Dimensions |
31 cm. |
| 336 ## - CONTENT TYPE |
|---|
| Source |
rdacontent |
| Content type term |
text |
| 337 ## - MEDIA TYPE |
|---|
| Source |
rdamedia |
| Media type term |
unmediated |
| 338 ## - CARRIER TYPE |
|---|
| Source |
rdacarrier |
| Carrier type |
volume |
| 501 ## - WITH NOTE |
|---|
| With note |
Thesis (Degree of Juris Doctor) -- University of Cebu-Banilad, 2016. |
| 504 ## - BIBLIOGRAPHY, ETC. NOTE |
|---|
| Bibliography, etc |
Includes bibliographical references (leaves 53-55). |
| 520 ## - SUMMARY, ETC. |
|---|
| Summary, etc |
Summary: The existing jurisprudence pertaining to trademark disputes is in a state of disarray. This study examines the trend in jurisprudence among relevant trademark cases touching on the issue of the holistic test and dominancy test, the tests being used to determine colorable imitation or likelihood of confusion. Particular attention is given to the case decisions for the past fifteen years. It begins with the overview of the history and the development of the law of trademarks. The cases are discussed in chronological order. It can be gleaned from the line of cases that the Supreme Court has not been consistent in its decision. There is no definite standard or criteria as to when one test should be used over the other, or when both tests are applicable. Moreover, there are instances wherein the holistic test and the dominancy test are incompatible, and the use of one over the other could spell out the finding of infringement. This lack of a clear standard poses some serious challenges for Intellectual Property owners who are at a loss whether to pursue an infringement case or to hold back considering the costly and protracted process of litigation in the Philippines. |
| 541 ## - IMMEDIATE SOURCE OF ACQUISITION NOTE |
|---|
| Deans/Chairperson |
|
| Department |
Law |
| Subject Category |
Law |
| 541 ## - IMMEDIATE SOURCE OF ACQUISITION NOTE |
|---|
| Deans/Chairperson |
|
| Department |
Law |
| Subject Category |
Law |
| 546 ## - LANGUAGE NOTE |
|---|
| Language note |
English |
| 942 ## - ADDED ENTRY ELEMENTS (KOHA) |
|---|
| Source of classification or shelving scheme |
|
| Type of record |
Thesis |
| 998 ## - LOCAL CONTROL INFORMATION (RLIN) |
|---|
| Encoded by |
Leah-Bei[new] |
| Date encoded |
06/22/2016 |
| 998 ## - LOCAL CONTROL INFORMATION (RLIN) |
|---|
| Encoded by |
Aillen[checked] |
| Date encoded |
07/16/2016 |
