000 -LEADER |
fixed length control field |
03027nam a22002897a 4500 |
003 - CONTROL NUMBER IDENTIFIER |
control field |
OSt |
005 - DATE AND TIME OF LATEST TRANSACTION |
control field |
20190717104043.0 |
008 - FIXED-LENGTH DATA ELEMENTS--GENERAL INFORMATION |
fixed length control field |
170125b xxu||||| |||| 00| 0 eng d |
040 ## - CATALOGING SOURCE |
Original cataloging agency |
University of Cebu-Banilad |
Transcribing agency |
University of Cebu-Banilad |
100 ## - MAIN ENTRY--PERSONAL NAME |
Personal name |
Tumulak, Karla Marie T. |
245 ## - TITLE STATEMENT |
Title |
Behind the cloak of religion, can 'hate speech' be protected speech? / |
Statement of responsibility, etc |
Karla Marie T. Tumulak. |
260 ## - PUBLICATION, DISTRIBUTION, ETC. (IMPRINT) |
Place of publication, distribution, etc |
Cebu City : |
Date of publication, distribution, etc |
2016. |
Name of publisher, distributor, etc |
University of Cebu, |
300 ## - PHYSICAL DESCRIPTION |
Extent |
vii, 198 leaves ; |
336 ## - CONTENT TYPE |
Source |
rdacontent |
Content type term |
text |
337 ## - MEDIA TYPE |
Source |
rdamedia |
Media type term |
unmediated |
338 ## - CARRIER TYPE |
Source |
rdacarrier |
Carrier type |
volume |
501 ## - WITH NOTE |
With note |
Thesis (Degree of Juris Doctor) -- University of Cebu-Banilad, 2016. |
504 ## - BIBLIOGRAPHY, ETC. NOTE |
Bibliography, etc |
Includes bibliographical references (leaves 184-194). |
505 ## - FORMATTED CONTENTS NOTE |
Formatted contents note |
Contents: Chapter I: The problem and its scope -- Chapter II: Review of related literature and studies theoretical framework, and conceptual framework -- Chapter III: Results and discussions -- Chapter IV: Summary of findings, conclusion, and recommendations -- References -- Appendices -- Curriculum Vitae. |
520 ## - SUMMARY, ETC. |
Summary, etc |
Summary : The principle of primacy of free speech and religious liberty is reflected in the many decisions of the Philippine Supreme Court intended to guard these fundamental liberties within the bounds of permissible Constitutional limits. The study's main problem concerns on whether or not hate speech premised on religious beliefs is considered a protected expression under the Free Speech and Free Exercise clauses of the Constitution. In approaching the issue concerned, the study utilized a qualitative comparative approach and the Habermasian Critical Discourse method to unpack the seemingly conflicting discourses and schools of thought that permeate the issue on hate speech.<br/><br/>The findings of the study show that the limitations on the exercise of both rights as laid down in statutes and jurisprudence have been carefully and strictly carved out to ensure that free speech and religious liberty are secured under utmost possible measures. This study follows an understanding of the hate speech dilemma through a paradigm that views hate speech as an assault on the dignity of the individual or group that it targets. In this regard, the ongoing libertarian-egalitarian debate provided the necessary legal and philosophical frameworks. A critical discourse analysis of the issue shows that there are inadequacies in using an originalist-libertarian approach towards hate speech especially on its lack of emphasis on the harmful effects of hate speech. Hence, this study proposes an alternative 'balancing' test grounded on a rights-based approach which synthesizes a workable solution on striking a balance between securing the liberties to free speech and religious expression while protecting affected communities from hate speech. |
541 ## - IMMEDIATE SOURCE OF ACQUISITION NOTE |
Deans/Chairperson |
|
Department |
Law |
Subject Category |
Law |
546 ## - LANGUAGE NOTE |
Language note |
English |
942 ## - ADDED ENTRY ELEMENTS (KOHA) |
Source of classification or shelving scheme |
|
Type of record |
Thesis |
998 ## - LOCAL CONTROL INFORMATION (RLIN) |
Encoded by |
jesstony [new] |
Date encoded |
1/25/2017 |
998 ## - LOCAL CONTROL INFORMATION (RLIN) |
Encoded by |
Aillen[checked] |
Date encoded |
10/12/2017 |