000 | 02001nam a22002657a 4500 | ||
---|---|---|---|
003 | OSt | ||
005 | 20190715094515.0 | ||
008 | 190608b xxu||||| |||| 00| 0 eng d | ||
040 |
_aUniversity of Cebu-Banilad _cUniversity of Cebu-Banilad |
||
100 | _aGabutan, Roshalane Jane B. | ||
245 |
_aThe legality of PNP anti-illegal drug campaign / _cRoshalane Jane B. Gabutan. |
||
260 |
_aCebu City : _bUniversity of Cebu, _c2018. |
||
300 |
_aiv, 131 leaves : _billustrations ; |
||
336 |
_2rdacontent _atext |
||
337 |
_2rdamedia _aunmediated |
||
338 |
_2rdacarrier _avolume |
||
501 | _aThesis (Degree of Juris Doctor) -- University of Cebu Banilad, 2018. | ||
504 | _aIncludes references (leaves 100-105). | ||
520 | _aSummary: This research determines the legality of "Oplan Tokhang" based on Command Memorandum Circular (CMC) 16-2016 and to answer the allegations that its implementation deprives a person of his right to life, liberty, and property. This is qualitative research. Primary sources of data (e.g. case laws) and the researcher made questionnaire were used for data gathering. The study concludes that the promulgation "Oplan Tokhang" and the basis of its issuance was a mere pronouncement of the President which is not pursuant to his statutory or constitutional rule-making power and dispensing with the publication requirement is a fatal defect because this violates the due process clause in a manner that the people are not apprised of the contents of CMC 16-2016. The Standard operating procedure in the conduct of "Oplan Tokhang" is tainted with irregularity as it infringes the rights under custodial investigation. The researcher recommends that the police officers should apprise the person of their custodial rights and to avoid encouraging or inviting people to surrender before the authorities. | ||
541 |
_xBaldomero Estenzo _yLaw _zLaw |
||
546 | _aEnglish | ||
942 |
_2ddc _cTHE |
||
998 |
_cJanine[new] _d06/08/2019 |
||
999 |
_c10228 _d10228 |