000 | 02878nam a2200301 4500 | ||
---|---|---|---|
001 | 00420603 | ||
003 | OSt | ||
005 | 20160701150618.0 | ||
008 | 090430s2008| ph | ||| |000 0|eng|d | ||
020 | _a9789719380627 [paperback] | ||
040 |
_aNLP _cNLP |
||
100 | _aSanchez, Ferdinand. | ||
245 |
_aProper remedies (in the supreme court) : _brule 45 or rule 65? (includes cases and jurisprudence up to july 31, 2008) / _cFerdinand Sanchez and Artemio R. Villaluz, Jr. |
||
260 |
_aManila : _bLexpertbooks, _cc2008. |
||
300 |
_aiv, 84 pages : _c23 cm. |
||
336 |
_2rdacontent _atext |
||
337 |
_2rdamedia _aunmediated |
||
338 |
_2rdacarrier _avolume |
||
505 | _aContents: Jurisdiction of the supreme court -- Procedure in the supreme court -- Recent development in criminal procedure -- Rule 45 and rule 65 pertain to different remedies and have distinct applications -- Appeal by certiorari (rule 45) and special civil action of certiorari (rule 65), distinguished -- Errors of jurisdiction, rule 65 petition; errors of judgment, rule 45 petition -- Certiorari cannot be availed of if the remedy of appeal is available -- Two-headed petition, proscribed -- Distinction between questions of law and questions of fact -- Distinction between questions of law and questions of fact -- Factual issue bar rule -- Questions of law and fact as determined by the supreme court -- Rule 45- Appeal by petition for review on certiorari -- Court of appeals, decision, final order or resolution, proper remedy is rule 45 -- Certain cases where resort to tule 65 considered proper -- Sandiganbayan, decision, final order or resolution, proper remedy is rule 45 -- Appeal from the regional trial court -- Decision of the regional trial court sitting as a special agrarian court, in a petition for determination of just compensation, the remedy is rule 43, not notice of appeal -- An order granting the petition for issuance of a writ of preliminary injunction where the question posed is one of law, remedy is held to be rule 45 -- Commission on elections and the commission of audit , appeal from judgment or final order or resolution is governed by rule 64 and 65 -- Court of tax appeals en banc, appeal from decision or ruling is rule 45 -- Exceptions; supreme court may treat rule 65 petition as having been filed under rule 45 -- Quasi-judicial bodies, whether the appeal involves questions of face, of law, or mixed questions of fact and law, shall be by petition for review under rule 43 -- Cases where e exception to the double jeopardy rule applied. | ||
541 |
_xBaldomero Estenzo _yLaw _zLaw |
||
546 | _aEnglish | ||
650 |
_aLaw _vStudy guides. _xExaminations _zPhilippines |
||
700 | _aVillaluz, Artemio R. | ||
942 |
_2ddc _cBK |
||
998 |
_cJia[new] _d05/23/2016 |
||
998 |
_cAillen[checked] _d07/01/2016 |
||
999 |
_c5548 _d5548 |