000			03743nam a22003017a 4500
003			OSt
005			20190710190659.0
008			160622b xxu||||| |||| 00| 0 eng d
040			_cUniversity of Cebu-Banilad _aUniversity of Cebu-Banilad
100			_aFranje, Hanelli Jane A.
245			_aSlow administration of justice : _ban analysis of the probable cause of overstaying of detention prisoners in jail / _cHanelli Jane A. Franje.
260			_aCebu city : _c2016. _bUniversity of Cebu,
300			_axi, 74 leaves : _c31 cm.
336			_2rdacontent _atext
337			_2rdamedia _aunmediated
338			_2rdacarrier _avolume
500			_aIncludes map of Cebu City, letter to the court, letter to the office of the prosecutor, letter to the respondents, statistical analysis, reliability test of the research instrument, and research instrument.
501			_aThesis (Degree of Juris Doctor) -- University of Cebu-Banilad, 2016.
504			_aIncludes bibliographical references (leaves 56-59).
520			_aSummary: The principal purpose of this study was to analyze slow administration of justice as the probable cause of overstaying of detention prisoners in jail in Cebu City. Specifically, it aimed to determine possible factors that could significantly contribute to the slow administration of justice and it's effect to overstaying of detention prisoners in jail. A total of 27 judges in Cebu City Hall of Justice served as the respondents of the study. An interview schedule through a researcher-made instrument was used to gather data on the perception of the respondents regarding slow administration of justice due to the court, the Public Attorneys' Office, Office of the Prosecutor and the Parties and Witnesses of the case as well as the overstaying of detention prisoners in jail. Descriptive research design was used to describe the data gathered and Pearson Product Moment Correlation was used to determine the relationship between the independent and department variables of the study. The results revealed, and the study concluded that slow administration of justice due to the courts, Public Attorneys' Office, Office of the Prosecutor and parties and Witnesses of the case have a significant relationship to the overstaying of detention prisoners in jail, tested at 0.05 level of significance. Based on the conclusions, the following recommendations are drawn: (1) it is recommended that a more stringent rules regarding the attendance of the PAO lawyers, prosecutor, parties and witnesses of the case must be applied; (2) it is recommended for the government to take the necessary steps in addressing the problem of insufficiency of court personnel in order to advance the administration of justice; (3) it is recommended for the government to put up additional courts in the judiciary in order to speed up the administration of justice in our country. The government must reexamine the procedures in court, as well as the different factors that significantly contributes to this problem to eventually find a solution. Furthermore, it is recommended for future researchers to include the Prosecutors, the PAO, private counsels and detention prisoners as respondents of the study. Other factors affecting overstaying of detention prisoners in jail may also be included such as lack of legal representation for detainees to follow-up their cases in court, lack of legal aid personnel in prison and poor administration of the prison.
541			_xBaldomero Estenzo _yLaw _zLaw
541			_xBaldomero Estenzo _yLaw _zLaw
546			_aEnglish
942			_2ddc _cTHE
998			_cLeah-Bei[new] _d06/22/2016
998			_cAillen[checked] _d07/16/2016
999			_c5681 _d5681